Hysterectomy for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding

 

 

Article By

Jose P. Noronha

Rina Maria Dias

Elvira Dias

 

This article has been reproduced from the August 1984 issue, Vol. 48 , No. 8, “ The Clinician”. Permission has been obtained from Dr. Elvira Dias for reprint of the article.

 

 

Summary:

The prevalence of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) requiring a hysterectomy was 9.44%, the highest incidence occurring in the age group of 40-44 years (40.63%). Majority of the patients (97.66%) were parous, out of which 57.04% were grand multipara. Menorrhagia, polymenorrhagia and menometrorrhagia were the commonest menstrual irregularities encountered. A history of sterilization by the Modified Pomeroy’s method was given by 18.75% of patients. Abdominal hysterectomy was carried out in 65.63% and vaginal hysterectomy in 33.59%.

The incidence of ovulatory endometrium  was 20.31%, anovulatory endometrium  was 61.71% and an atrophic endometrium was 1.56%. In the study group, subsequent histopathological examination of the uterine specimens revealed fibromyomas and adenomyosis in 21 cases (16.41%). Thus, hysterectomy has a definite place in the management of DUB, particularly in the age group above 40 years, decision being based upon the nature of the endometrium, particularly in view of the progressive nature of the endometrial hyperplasias.

 

Irregular or excessive bleeding from the uterus is one of the most common symptoms the gynaecologist is called upon to diagnose and treat. When it occurs in the pre-menopausal age group, it may assume a sinister significance always requiring close analysis to differentiate it from the more serious bleeding of uterine malignancy, with or without associated fibroids, often met with at this age. The term dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) is defined  as abnormal  endometrial bleeding in  which organic  lesions  cannot  be demonstrated. It embraces all types of abnormal menstruation  and  uterine  bleeding, provided infection, neoplasm  and  pregnancy  have been excluded. There  have been many  modalities  of management that have been resorted to in the last decade. Hysterectomy has a major role to play in pre-menopausal women and older women where the  need  to  preserve  reproductive  function  is minimal,  more  so  when  the  other  forms  of treatment  like  hormonal  and  anti-fibrinolytic therapy, and dilatation and curettage, may have been used without any beneficial effect. This is a review of hysterectomies carried  out  for  DUB during a three-year period from July 1979 to June 1982.

 

Material and Methods :

All the patients admitted in the gynaecological ward during this period for hysterectomy for DUB were screened and data referring to the age of the patient, parity, type of menstrual  irregularity, associated symptoms, and previous operative procedures was compiled. In addition, the incidence of patients with DUB amongst  all the  hospital  admissions  was evaluated along with the incidence of hysterectomy for the same.

 

Observation and Results :

  1. During the study period, 13,561 gynaecological admissions were made, of these 1,356 cases of DUB were admitted, thus giving an incidence of 10%. During this same period, of the total of 1,356 cases of DUB, a total of 128 patients were admitted for hysterectomy thus the incidence of hysterectomy was 9.44%.
  2. Out of the cases subjected to hysterectomy, the prevalence of DUB was highest in the age group of 40-44 years. There were no cases below the age of 30 years, the youngest patient being 30 years old while the oldest was 50 years old.
  3. Out of 128 cases studied, only three cases (2.34%) were nulliparous, thus showing that it was more common in multiparae (97.66%). The incidence of grand multiparae was 57.04%.
  4. A variety of menstrual irregularities were encountered, with some patients having more than  one  irregularity. Menorrhagia  was the commonest menstrual irregularity encountered (37.5%) followed by polymenorrhagia (23.44%). The different menstrual irregularities are shown in Table 1.

 

TC- Jul 2016 - 014 - Table 1 - Menorrhagia (37.5%); polymenorrhagia

  1. All the patients were subjected to  a routine dilatation and curettage and a cervix biopsy was carried out on a clinically suspicious cervix. A special note was made of previous puerperal and vaginal ligations. 25.78% of our  patients underwent a cervix biopsy, 15.63% underwent a puerperal  ligation whereas 3.12% a vaginal ligation. All sterilizations were performed  by Modified Pomeroy’s method. Table 2 indicates the endometrial pattern of the patients in the study group.

TC- Jul 2016 - 015 - Table 2 - The endometrial pattern of patients

 

  1. Abdominal hysterectomy was the commonest surgical procedure performed for DUB, carried out in 65.63% of cases. 33.59% underwent a vaginal  hysterectomy whereas  0.78% had  an abdominal hysterectomy with an anterior- posterior repair for DUB with cystocoele and rectocoele and  no  descent  of cervix. Two patients (1.56%) were given a Kelly’s stitch for stress incontinence, during the vaginal hysterectomy.
  2. There was no post-operative mortality, the most common problem encountered  was febrile morbidity due to either urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infection or coincident viral fever. We had one case each of pelvic abscess, vault haematoma and intestinal obstruction.
  3. It is interesting to note that of the 128 patients that were subject to hysterectomy, 21 patients were found to have significant pathology of leiomyoma and  adenomyosis, which were missed clinically, thus giving a percentage of 16.41% of missed pathology.

 

 

Discussion :

DUB is an  all-inclusive term  or  “Rag-Bag” comprising of a group of menstrual disorders of different aetiologies and it is not a single disease entity. The diagnosis of DUB is at present made by excluding organic disease of the genital tract.

The incidence of dysfunctional uterine bleeding at the Boston Hospital for women (Kistner, 1980) was approximately 5% of all admissions; in addition, this  process  accounts  for  about  60% of all diagnostic curettages. Taylor (1965) reports DUB as a first diagnosis in at least 10% of all new out-patients seen both privately and at hospital.

DUB may occur at any age between puberty and menopause, but it is most frequently encountered at  the  two extremes of menstrual  life, when disturbances  of  ovarian  function  are  most common.  Israel (1967) has observed that  two-thirds of the patients treated in the hospital for DUB were over 40 years of age and only 3% were under 20 years. Similarly, Sutherland (1953) found that  fewer than  4% of his patients subjected to curettage for DUB were less than 20 years of age. In our study, no patients below 30 years of age were admitted for hysterectomy, 20.32% of the patients were from the age group of 30-39 years, whereas 72.56% of cases were from the group of 40-49 years. Only 7.03% of cases were 50 years and above. This very well proves Sir John  Dewhurst’s  (1981) dictum that hysterectomy should be the first resort in patients in the age group of 40 years and above, if bleeding is persistent after dilatation and curettage and hormone therapy, seldom in the age group of 20-40 years, only to be done if bleeding is persistent or  severe after  dilatation  and  curettage  and hormone  therapy.  Dewhurst,  (1981) includes abnormalities  of the  thyroid  and  haemopoietic system under DUB but not a single case in our study had any such abnormalities.

Since a suspicion was raised in the past by many authors  regarding the effect of sterilization and subsequent development of DUB, all patients who underwent sterilization were reviewed regarding the mode, the method and the route of sterilization. In a study of 1101 post-partum tubal ligations report  by Jacob et al (1979), 561 were carried out by Modified Pomeroy’s method, 135 by the Uchida’s method and 405 were done vaginally. The difference in immediate complications of the two groups was not very significant. However, the incidence of DUB, a late complication, was 13% in the Modified Pomeroy’s method, while it was only 2% in  the  Uchida  group.  The development  of menorrhagia  after  tubal  sterilization  using Modified Pomeroy’s method is perhaps related to the  interruption  of the  terminal  branch  of the uterine artery to the ovary, thus resulting in a cystic degeneration of that structure. Some hold the view that the utero-tubal circulation is impaired by the tubal  sterilization,  causing engorgement  of the venous circulation of the uterus, with subsequent menorrhagia.  Uchida’s    method  has a sparing effect on the ovarian blood supply and hence the incidence of subsequent menorrhagia is much less. Jacob et al (1979) advocate the  routine  use of Uchida’s method of tubal ligation.

As mentioned  before, 21 patients (16.41%) were found to have a pathology like fibromyoma and adenomyosis and had to be excluded from the final list.

 

Acknowledgement :

We thank Dr. G.J.S. Abraham, Dean, Goa Medical College for  permitting  us  to  publish  hospital records.

 

References :

  1. Abel S. Causes of abnormal uterine bleeding. Clin. Obst & Gynaec. 1958; 1:741.
  2. Allen WM. Functional uterine bleeding. Clin. Obst. & Gynaec. 1958; 1:825.
  3. Dewhurst CJ. Integrated Obstetrics  and Gynaecology for Postgraduates.  3rd Edition. Melbourne: Blackwell Scientific Publications;1981.
  4. Hall JE. Applied Gynaecological Pathology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1962.
  5. Hark B, Sommers SC. Endometrial curettage in diagnosis and therapy. Obst. & Gynaec. 1963; 21:636.
  6. Howkins J, Bourne G. Shaw’s textbook of gynaecology. 9th Edition. The English Language Book Society and  Churchill  Livingstone. Reprinted, 1973.
  7. Israel SL. Diagnosis and treatment of menstrual disorders and sterility. 5th edition.  Hoeber Medical Division, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, Evanston and London. 1967.
  8. Jeffcoate TNA. Principles of Gynaecology. 4th Edition. Butter Worths, London and Boston. Reprinted 1981.
  9. Kistner RW. Gynaecology, Principles and Practice. 3rd Edition. Year  Book  Medical Publishers. INC, Chicago, London. Reprinted Sept.1983.
  10. Mattingly RF. Telinde’s Operative Gynaecology. 5th Edition. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, Toronto. 1977.

 

  1. Masani KM. A textbook of gynaecology. 7th Edition. Bombay: Popular Prakashan. 1973.
  2. Munnel EW, Flick FH. The surgical diagnosis and management of  dysfunctional  uterine bleeding. Surg. Gynaec. & Obst. 1958; 106:321.
  3. Novak E. Functional uterine bleeding. A summarizing review. Obst. & Gynaec. Survey. 1946; 1:682.
  4. Philip EE, Barnes J, Newton M. Scientific Foundations of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2nd Edition. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd. 1977.
  5. Radman HM. Blood dyscrasias as a causative factor in abnormal uterine bleeding. Am. J. Obst. & Gynaec; 79:1 2960.
  6. Schroeder R. Endometrial hyperplasia in relation to genital function.  Am. J. Obst. & Gynaec. 1954; 68:294.